U.S. OFFERS $10 MILLION IN FUNDING FOR ARMENIAN GENOCIDE LIE ALLEGATIONS FROM

US offers 10 million funds for Armenian genocide lie claims

It is planned to allocate a $ 10 million fund to the Library of Congress program to instill the lie of the “Armenian genocide” to American citizens. This bill, which is stated to cover the period of our history from 1915 to 1923, will come to the Congress by a joint decision of the two parties.

According to reports in newspapers in recent days, a law is being prepared in the US House of Representatives for the inclusion of the so-called “Armenian genocide” in the educational curriculum. The “cross-party” bill, prepared with the joint signature of Democrat Carolyn Maloney and Republican Gus Bilirakis, bears the title “Armenian Genocide Education Act”. With this proposal, it is envisaged that a $ 10 million fund will be allocated to the Library of Congress program to instill the lie of the “Armenian genocide” to American citizens. This bill, which is stated to cover the period of our history from 1915 to 1923, will come to the Congress by a joint decision of the two parties. In other words, Turkey, which defended its homeland with the First World War and the National Liberation War, aims to declare the Turkish people “genocidal” once again.

One of the purposes of the bill may be to prevent the positive outcome of the negotiations between the states of Turkey and Armenia, which are described as going Decently. The imperialists never, ever want the peoples to be friends. The Armenian people will suffer more from the hostility that is opposed to its end. The United States is one of the countries that have not signed the Lausanne Agreement. He does not recognize our border with Armenia or Iraq.

As of April 24, Biden recognized the “genocide” last year. Now we are going one step further. It is requested that this big lie be included in education and recorded in the minds of young people. The goal is to antagonize peoples... to make them break against each other. In addition, the US administration plans to get the support of its own people as a power.

NO PARLIAMENT CAN MAKE THIS DECISION

Genocide is a legal concept. Just as no parliament can gather and take the decision “he is a murderer” for a person, it cannot make the decision “he committed genocide” for a nation. Even Macron stressed that the definition of ”genocide" should be evaluated by lawyers, not politicians. The purpose of all initiatives in this direction in recent years is political. These efforts are a means of psychological warfare carried out by the imperialists, especially the United States. It's his gun. The intention, as emphasized above, is to make peoples hostile to each other. It is to weaken the resisting power of the Turkish nation. It is to isolate the Turkish nation.

The term “genocide” is not used before jurist Raphael Lemkin uses it for the first time. This term enters the United Nations dictionary by resolution No. 260 of December 9, 1948. Uluç Gürkan, who has signed important studies on this issue, draws attention to the decision of the British Crown Prosecutor's Office that there is “no place for prosecution” as a result of the trials in Malta: “The United Nations Genocide Convention has designated the competent authority for the existence or absence of the crime of genocide as ‘judicial bodies‘. It is also explained in the Convention which judicial organ or organs are authorized. The truth that we have forgotten in this context, that we want to be made to forget, I. After World War II, many Union and Progress Party leaders were held in Malta for almost three years on charges of ‘mass murder of Armenians’ and were included in the scope of ’investigation’ in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty of Sevres. However, the British Crown Prosecutor's Office conducting the investigation has not found any evidence of a ‘massacre/crimea’ that has ‘legal validity’ against these people in the UK and America, as well as the occupied Ottoman archive. For this reason, he reached the decision that there was ’no room for prosecution' and ensured their release.

“It is inevitable that Turkey will remember and embrace the legal consequences of this trial process in Malta, which we have documented as working under the same conditions as the Nuremberg Tribunal where the Jewish Genocide trial was held, which radically refutes the claims of the ‘Armenian Genocide’.”

"Historian Bernard Lewis also rejects the claims of the ’Armenian Genocide' and I. He describes what happened in the Ottoman lands during the World War II as a 'tragedy of war'”

THE PERINÇEK DECISION OF THE ECHR

As it is known, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on Doğu Perincek's application against Switzerland filed in 2008 on December 17, 2013. As a result, the ECHR found Perincek to be right. In addition, the Court ruled that Switzerland had violated Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which regulates freedom of expression.

Perincek had applied to the ECHR in 2008 after being sentenced to various convictions in this country in 2007 for “denying the allegations of the Armenian Genocide” in speeches he made in Switzerland about the events of 1915.

Perincek emphasizes that the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is “the beginning of a new era and a milestone, as determined by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” He explains the consequences of this decision in substance, in summary, as follows:

"One: The ECHR has liberated the discussion of the Armenian genocide claim in Europe. He decided on the determination ’the Armenian genocide is an imperialist lie' within the framework of freedom of expression of thought. "Two: it is not within the authority of the courts and parliaments to determine the truth about the Armenian genocide allegations. This issue is in the field of historical examination and discussion.(...) The decisions taken are now legally in the garbage.”

"Three: The ECHR decision says that ’The Armenian events are not classified as genocide of the Jews'. The legal value of this is as important as the judgment that there was no genocide. True, the ECHR says that it has not reached a verdict on the Armenian events as to whether genocide occurred or not. This is also our thesis. Because we have been constantly reminding since Lausanne that the Courts cannot make a decision on this issue, and we have achieved our goal. However, the ECHR decision has destroyed the basis of the Armenian genocide claim in international law. (...) The only genocide defined by the law is the Jewish genocide. To determine that any event is not like a ‘Jewish genocide’ means that it is not actually a genocide legally.”

WHAT ARMENIA'S FIRST PRIME MINISTER SAYS

I conclude my article with the assessment of Ohannes Kaçaznuni, the first Prime Minister of Armenia, who I think is very explanatory on the Armenian problem. Ohannes Kaçaznuni admits that they “fell for England's promise of a great Armenia from sea to sea”, the most powerful imperialist state of that period. He accepts the fact that relocation is an effective and mandatory solution with a striking narrative:

“during the summer and autumn of 1915, the Armenians of Turkey were subjected to deportation (forced migration), mass deportations and raids were carried out. All this dealt a fatal blow to the Armenian issue. (...) The Turks knew what they were doing and there is no reason for them to regret it; as it turned out later, this method was the surest and most appropriate method for a permanent solution of the Armenian issue in Turkey.”