Ey,Dünya,İnSünüzsaları,Hepiniz,Türk,

THE AFGHANISTAN GEOPOLITICS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAS CROWNED AND HAS TO WITHDRAW FROM AFGHANISTAN IN DEADLY

   AND THE INVOICE IS REQUESTED TO PAY TO TURKEY

   Afghanistan

The socio-economic and security problems that will be triggered by immigration and terrorism originating from Afghanistan will trigger new political, economic and ethnic problems from North Africa to the Pacific coasts of Asia.

A new page in the history of the country opened with the announcement of US President Joe Biden that his country and NATO members will withdraw their troops from Afghanistan on April 14, 2021. What happened in the four months following the announcement produced nightmare scenarios for the international community. By the beginning of 2021, the Taliban, which only controlled the rural areas of the country, started to control the borders of Iran, Pakistan and Tajikistan with the departure of the US soldiers from the country. In the first week of August, it captured 5 provincial centers within 72 hours. The Taliban are marching to power without repeating the mistakes of their first takeover in 1996, without giving a chance to a coalition capable of resisting it, like the Northern Alliance. As of August 10, the Taliban came to control 85% of the country's territory. So, how could the US political and military decision makers not take into account that the Taliban could have the capacity to overthrow the Afghan national government in such a short time? At what point was the superpower USA wrong about the Taliban, which had the experience of Saigon being captured by communist North Vietnamese forces in 1975? Or was he actually wrong?

Can we explain the situation created by the USA in Afghanistan today as “a series of incompetence added to the lack of foresight”? Or has the US deliberately left a Trojan Horse at the doorstep of Central Asia, South Asia, the Asia-Pacific region and the Middle East? How did the international community find the chaos ball consisting of intertwined problems in their arms when they thought that the occupation would come to an end and peace would come to the region with the US withdrawal from Afghanistan?

The only way out is to form a coalition that will fill the vacuum left by the withdrawal of the USA and NATO, not only with its military but also with its humanitarian and economic dimensions, while the problem is still on Afghan territory.

Attention to the sudden change of discourse in the USA!

To get an idea of ​​the answers to these questions, let's take a quick look at the statements and actions of the US Department of Defense and American diplomats on August 6-9: By August, the Afghan national government will maintain the military balance on the ground with the air support they provide and convince the Taliban to sit at the negotiating table. Believing that, the USA completely changed the language it used as the situation on the ground clearly contradicted the messages they were giving to the world.

U.S. Department of Defense Spokesperson John F. Kirby stated at the press conference on August 9 that the Taliban had gains in the field during the period of former President Donald Trump, implying that the organization's progress is not directly related to the decisions of the Biden administration. Contrary to the statements of the US officials who claimed that the Taliban would not be able to seize the provincial centers until ten days ago, Kirby said that it was alarming that 5 provincial centers fell into the hands of the Taliban in 72 hours, and placed the responsibility of protecting the cities on the Afghan people and the administration. Another important statement of the US Department of Defense spokesperson was about the question of whether the US would continue to provide air support to the Afghanistan national army after August 31. Kirby stated that it would be a controversial approach to answer this question in advance, creating the impression that this support may also be limited. Although the air support launched by the USA using B-52 heavy bombers inflicted heavy losses on the Taliban, the cost of the operation does not make it possible to be long-term and sustainable. The USA also used the destructive power of the B-52s in Vietnam, and the result it could achieve was to bring North Vietnam to the table and persuade it to negotiate. The possibility of the same weapon having a similar effect on the Taliban is nothing more than a vague expectation. As a matter of fact, the US administration immediately sent Afghanistan Special Representative Zalmay Khalilzad to Doha, the capital of Qatar, on August 8, to see the effect of B-52 planes on the Taliban and to stop the occupation of provincial capitals. However, experience to date indicates that the influence of the "Taliban Political Bureau" and the "Political Affairs Commission", which conducts the peace negotiations that Khalilzad met in Doha, are limited. There has been no concrete evidence that the Taliban representatives in Doha have had any influence over the "Military Affairs Commission" on the ground.

In the negotiations to date, the USA has not had the opportunity to meet directly with Mevlevi Hibetullah Ahundzade, who has been leading the Taliban since 2016, or with his Deputy for Political Affairs Mullah Abdulgani Baradar. Likewise, Mullah Mohammed Yaqub, who was in charge of the military operations of the Taliban, was able to establish a direct relationship.